Регистрация / Вход
Прислать материал

What drove the evolution of humans and hominids: the case study of core promoters evolution

Scientific organization
Center of Brain Neurobiology and Neurogenetics, Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS
Academic degree
Staff Researcher
Scientific discipline
Life Sciences & Medicine
What drove the evolution of humans and hominids: the case study of core promoters evolution
Modern humans possess at least one feature that makes them be strongly different from anthropoids (chimpanzee and gorilla): being eurybiontic. To find evidence of selection for widening the norm of reaction of the genotype in human lineage, we have focused on the structural and functional evolution of the core promoters of human genes. It has been demonstrated that the spectrum of epigenetic possibilities for regulation in the core promoters of genes accumulated during the evolution of human lineage. In the ape lineages, the reverse is true: changes that narrow this spectra prevail.
wide norm of reaction of the genotype, core promoters evolution, human, hominids

Whole-genome comparisons of protein-coding sequences between humans and chimpanzees or gorilla suggest that they differ by 1‑2% only, which is in sharp contrast with the significant morphological and ecological differences. There are sets of functionally-related genes, which are most strongly driven by adaptive evolution. In all three species, the primary evolving entities were spermatogenesis, receptors, the immune system,  genes for signal transduction (for example, G-proteins) and embryogenesis regulation [1-5]. It was anticipated that the elevated rate of the evolution of certain brain genes observed in the human lineage would be species-specific.  However, to date a very few genes have been found showing prominent  brain-specific expression along with a signature of an adaptive evolution of protein-coding sequences in humans, but not in other anthropoids [1-5]. Missense- or loss-of-function mutations in genes showing accelerated evolution in human lineage may lead to severe pathologies and can be deleterious in human and animal populations [3]. It is conceivable that  the selection acting on compensatory genetic variants interfering with deleterious mutations may also contribute to the process of adaptive evolution. Modern humans possess at least one feature that makes them be strongly different from anthropoids (chimpanzee and gorilla): the broad tolerances to the environment or, as Th. Dobzhansky spoke – “man is genetically specialized to be unspecialized” [6]. As a result, humans can live in a broad spectrum of habitats and landscapes, spreading across the continents [7-9]. This broad tolerance to the environment is associated with a widening norm-of-reaction [10] of the genotype [11]. Consequently, the sought-for hominoid-specific vector of selection may have been directed at widening the norm-of-reaction, that is, being associated not so much with the reduced or increased level of expression of the specific genes as with the enhanced regulatory plasticity of the genes or ability to vary the gene expression level within a broad range. To our knowledge no search for evidence of such selection using whole-genome data has been performed as yet.

In this study, we focused on the structural and functional evolution of the core promoters of human genes, especially of those expressed in the brain prefrontal cortex. In 2011, a map with TATA-box locations for 17181 human genes was reported [12]. At that time, the map was exclusively based on Cap-analysis gene expression (CAGE) data counting capped 5′ ends of transcript sequences. At present, the location of a gene promoter is considered to be  clearly determined if more than one independent experimental approaches identifies the same position [13, 14]. In this study, the positions of promoters were inferred from two independent sources of experimental information: 1) CAGE data obtained from a large number of tissue-specific experiments, and 2) СhIP-seq data revealing the presence of transcriptionally active promoters in certain genomic regions marked by  trimethylated histones H3K4 (H3K4me3), a chromatin protein associated with transcriptional start sites (TSS). According to modern views, transcription does not proceed continuously, but by jerks called “transcriptional bursts”, the magnitude of which “is a promoter-specific property that is relatively robust to sequence mutations but is strongly dependent on the interaction between the TATA box and promoter nucleosomes” [15], which, in turn, is dependent on the abundance of CG dinucleotides in the promoter [16]. Moreover, there are a plenty of papers arguing whether increasing CpG sites (DNA regions enriched with CG dinucleotides) in a promoter can increase the range of transcriptional levels [17, 18]. Considering this view, we have performed an analysis of the evolution of three features of the upstream region of core promoter [‑600; -1]:  (1) appearance or disappearance of CG dinucleotides, (2) predicted nucleosomal packing levels (nucleosome/DNA affinity), and (3) predicted affinity for TATA-binding protein (TBP/DNA affinity).

As a result, we demonstrated that the trend to increased spectrum   regulatory capacities for the core promoters of genes accumulated during the evolution of two ancestral lineages preceding the divergences the ancestor of all hominids (humans, chimpanzee and gorilla) and the divergence of chimpanzee and humans was continued in the evolution of human lineage. In the anthropoid lineages (chimpanzee, gorilla and orangutan), the reverse is true: changes in promoters that narrow this spectrum prevail. This implies that, first, the origin of Homo sapiens is associated with a selection for widening the norm-of-reaction of gene expression regulation. Second, by contrast, the origins of the three ape species (especially gorilla and chimpanzee) are associated with a species-specific selection for narrowing the norm-of-reaction of gene expression regulation. Third, the selective trend towards widening the norm-of-reaction of gene regulation in the hominids is quite ancient – at least more ancient than the chimpanzee/humans split event occurring 5-6 million years ago.


1. ​Wildman DE et al. Implications of natural selection in shaping 99.4% nonsynonymous DNA identity between humans and chimpanzees: enlarging genus Homo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:7181-7188.

2. Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium. Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature 2005, 437:69-87.

3. Scally A et al. Insights into hominid evolution from the gorilla genome sequence. Nature 2012, 483:169-175.

4. Arbiza L et al. Positive selection, relaxation, and acceleration in the evolution of the human and chimp genome. PLoS Comput Biol 2006, 2:e38.

5. Nielsen R et al. A scan for positively selected genes in the genomes of humans and chimpanzees. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e170.

6. Dobzhansky Th: Genetic entities in hominid evolution. In: Washburn S.L. ed. Classification and Human Evolution. Routledge, 2013. p.347-363

7. Darwin C. A Naturalist's Voyage Round the World: The Voyage of the Beagle. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1930.

8. Mesa NR et al. Autosomal, mtDNA, and Y-chromosome diversity in Amerinds: pre- and post-Columbian patterns of gene flow in South America. Am J Hum Genet 2000, 67:1277-1286.

9. Manica A et al. Geography is a better determinant of human genetic differentiation than ethnicity. Hum Genet 2005, 118:366-371.

10. Platt SA, Sanislow CA. Norm-of-reaction: definition and misinterpretation of animal research. J Comp Psychol. 1988 102:254-261.

11. Schmalhausen II. Factors of Evolution: The Theory of Stabilizing Selection. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press; 1986.

12. Yang MQ et al. Genome-wide detection of a TFIID localization element from an initial human disease mutation. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:2175-2187.

13. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012, 489:57-74.

14. Kawaji H et al. Comparison of CAGE and RNA-seq transcriptome profiling using clonally amplified and single-molecule next-generation sequencing. Genome Res. 2014, 24:708-717.

15. Hornung G et al. Noise-mean relationship in mutated promoters. Genome Res 2012, 22:2409-2417.

16. Deaton AM, Bird A. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev 2011, 25:1010-1022.

17. Frith MC, FANTOM consortium. Explaining the correlations among properties of mammalian promoters. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:4823-4832.

18. Tatarinova T et al. Cross-species analysis of genic GC3 content and DNA methylation patterns. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5:1443-1456.